Cases 111 - 120 of 36,350
MCCARTHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
A. SMITH and GEO/N.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZEHNER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOEL ZEHNER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESSLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RESSLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
LARRY LINTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER, ARAMARK, INC., ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodvine v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Wellpath LLC, John and Jane Doe Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mclean
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Martinez M Edwards
Defendant:
Joseph A Mclean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Woodridge v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. MOORE and SEAN JONES
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
