Cases 21 - 30 of 143
KEY et al v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
DAJUAN KEY and ERNEST RUSSEL
Defendant:
USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER D/B/A COMMISSIONER INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER D/B/A COMMISSIONER INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, FRANK VANIHEL D/B/A WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, DAVID LIEBEL D/B/A SUPERVISOR OF RELIGIOUS SERVICES INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOX v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
KEVERY KNOX
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FORREST v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
GARY FORREST
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Damion Pryor
Defendant:
Warden William Hyatte, Deputy Warden George Payne, Jr., William Hyatte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHMOND et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN RICHMOND
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, CHAPLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
William Anderson
Defendant:
Warden William Hyatte, Deputy Warden George Payne, Jr., William Hyatte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HOLLON
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Priscal v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jake Priscal
Defendant:
Warden William Hyatte and Deputy Warden George Payne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
