Cases 31 - 40 of 444
PHILLIPS v. REASONER et al
as 1:2023cv01700
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DEBORAH REASONER, REAGLE, SCAFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
KEITH CHANDLER
Defendant:
G. WILLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DICKSON et al
as 1:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, SCAFE, J. SHAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Richmiller et al
as 3:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
Glen Phillips
Defendant:
Jonathan Richmiller, Brittany P Greene, Andrew Manton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
BRYAN PHILLIP JOSEPH TUGGLE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
J. SHAVERS, E. KNOTTS, PAULA DICKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
THOMAS, ERNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISTRUNK v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
GARY KEITH SISTRUNK
Defendant:
SCOTT MAPLES, GURD, ESLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Thomas
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, Sheronda Phillips, Mellissa Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SCAFE et al
as 1:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SCAFE, DEBORAH REASONER, MATTHEW BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
