Cases 71 - 80 of 36,257
James Gilman v. Samuel Byrd, et al
as 24-1951
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. GILMAN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, M.D., CHELSEY PEARISON, R.N., BARBARA RIGGS, R.N. and others
Calvin Lee v. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin
as 24-1945
Plaintiff:
CALVIN D. LEE
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN
JEFFRIS v. VANTLIN
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. JEFFRIS
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROCK et al v. VANTLIN
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
ELIAS A. BROCK and DENNIS JAY JEFFRIS
Defendant:
DOUG VANTLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALBALADEJO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBALADEJO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Henzie et al
as 1:2024cv04507
Plaintiff:
Terry Barker
Defendant:
Marlene Henzie, E. Aguinaldo and H. Bruckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obamedo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Marlo Latrice Obamedo
Defendant:
Dart and Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWINNER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
CHASE SCHWINNER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODGERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
JAPHETH RODGERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORMANE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ORMANE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
