Cases 81 - 90 of 118
MARTIN v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2014cv00836
Respondent:
GRACE BROWN, CORIZON HEALTH, AARON CUNNINGHAM and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2014cv00140
Defendant:
C.O. MCWHIRTER, STANLEY KNIGHT, LIEUTENANT CADDELL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2013cv00397
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BYER, CORIZON HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00220
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DALE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2013cv00088
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, CORIZON, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL LEE LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2013cv00093
Defendant:
CONNIE ALIEN, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL LEE LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINER v. APPMAN
as 1:2013cv00239
Defendant:
LAWANDA APPMAN, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD P. KINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARNER v. LEMMONS et al
as 2:2013cv00020
Defendant:
MICHAEL EASTON, RANDELL P. GENTRY, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE GARNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2013cv00008
Defendant:
JAMES BASSINGER, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY G. HOPKINS
Defendant:
STANLEY KNIGHT and BRUCE LEMMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
