Cases 1 - 10 of 87
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON v. LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv01576
Defendant:
LOGANSPORT STATE HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS CALLIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II A/K/A DEJAUNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBEY v. FENNIG et al
as 1:2024cv01315
Defendant:
FENNIG and ANDERSON
Plaintiff:
TERRELL JAMES ROBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Defendant:
Tiffany Lewis, Jonathan Hill, Richard Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. ROCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Defendant:
APRIL GELTMAKER and STEPHANIE K. ROCKEY
Plaintiff:
DEJUANE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAMUS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
MORANY DEAMUS
Defendant:
JAMIE ANDERSON, M. KIERSZNOWSKI and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WEISNER
as 1:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
CINDY WEISNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. GARNETT
as 1:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
PAUL GARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. CHALOS et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
ORVILLE A. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
CHALOS and POLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. HARVEY et al
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
DAIMIA R. ANDERSON
Defendant:
HARVEY, JULIE STOUT and ROBIN GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
