Cases 1 - 10 of 30
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCAMMON v. GUTLING et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN MCCAMMON
Defendant:
GUTLING, WOODS, TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. BAILEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, JOHN NWANNUNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
TRESHAWN BAILEY
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv02435
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. BAILEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, JOHN NWANNUNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BAILEY v. HALL
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
S. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY-FRANKLIN v. MULLER et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
ERIC LAMONT BAILEY-FRANKLIN
Defendant:
MULLER, DIANE, RITA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. ROWE et al
as 4:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. BAILEY
Defendant:
ROWE and MCCARTHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. AMBER et al
as 1:2021cv02747
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
AMBER, BAILEY, J. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
