Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Raffel Systems LLC v. Man Wah Holdings LTD Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01765
Defendant:
Man Wah Holdings LTD., Inc., Man Wah Holdings LTD Inc, XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Raffel Systems LLC
Special Master:
David E Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Lit v. Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
as 1:2018cv02059
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lit
Defendant:
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Internet Media Interactive Corp v. Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
as 1:2018cv00295
Plaintiff:
Internet Media Interactive Corp.
Defendant:
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gharb v. Rockwell Automation et al
as 1:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
Samy Gharb
Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Keith Nosbusch, Douglas M. Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Monsanto Company et al v. Jones
as 3:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology, L.L.C.
Defendant:
John Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arimathea LLC v. WM. Wrigley Jr. Company et al
as 1:2008cv03796
Plaintiff:
Arimathea LLC, Arimathea LLC, Arimathea LLC and others
Defendant:
WM. Wrigley Jr. Company, Big Sky Brands Inc., Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. 157 Ontario, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01108
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
157 Ontario, Inc. and Craig Pesek
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. ZENITH GOLDLINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 1:2001cv00443
Intervenor Plaintiff:
DOW JONES
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and ZENITH GOLDLINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Intervenor:
NOVOPHARM, LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
