Cases 31 - 40 of 10,847
Claudette Rabdeau v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1691
Plaintiff:
CLAUDETTE ANN RABDEAU
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoffman, Tracy v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Hoffman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
Jenifer Watson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anguis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anguis
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Caroline M. Meyer
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Proctor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Nichole Proctor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
SMITHEY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
JAMIE NICOLE SMITHEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suprise v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Stephanie M Suprise
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
