Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kolosick v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Bryan A Kolosick
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PILES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. PILES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Orlet v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01231
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Orlet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PILES v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01723
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. PILES
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv02020
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Jordan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Beauprez v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv04203
Plaintiff:
Bryan Alan Beauprez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv04195
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01175
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Richea Mae Bryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HOBBS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01200
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
BRYAN D. HOBBS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
