Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC. et al v. PROTECTIVE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY et al
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC., INDIANA LJ REINSURANCE LIMITED and JAMES H. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
PROTECTIVE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY and B. THOMAS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Esurance Insurance Services, Inc. v. Jennifer Tucker et al
as 3:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Esurance Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jennifer Tucker, United Auto Delivery and Recovery, Inc., Bridgecrest Credit Co., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re MDL-1700 FedEx Ground Package System Inc Employment Practices Litigation No II
as 3:2005md00527
Plaintiff:
Ed Rosa, Steve Hatton, Barry Whittemore and others
Defendant:
Albert Rettinger, Federal Express, All FedEx Ground Defendants and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Special Master:
Hon James Rosenbaum
Not Yet Classified:
Law Offices of George A. Barton and Palmer Freeman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Lucas et al
as 1:2018cv06578
Plaintiff:
Victoria Smith
Defendant:
William Lucas, Fred H. Smith LLC, Diana Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig & Landreth, Inc., et al v. Mazda Motor of America, Incor
as 11-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC., doing business as CRAIG & LANDRETH MAZDA (Dealer Code No. 34514), LARRY CRAIG and JAMES H. SMITH, JR., also known as JIMMY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, doing business as MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATIONS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 1:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERRICK H. SMITH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC. et al v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
as 4:2007cv00134
Plaintiff:
LARRY CRAIG and JAMES H. SMITH, JR.
Dealer Code No. 34514:
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC.
Defendant:
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
