Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sukalich v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Corey Paul Edward Sukalich
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Corey Leonard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SACKS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
COREY M. SACKS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv03511
Plaintiff:
Corey Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WEAVER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
COREY T. WEAVER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sara Randall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sara Randall obo Corey Randall and Sara Randall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seefeldt v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01546
Plaintiff:
Corey J Seefeldt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BARRY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
COREY JAMES BARRY
Defendant:
COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
Corey Phillips
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Venet, Corey v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Corey Venet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
