Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Earl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01233
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Joseph T Earl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
EARL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
GRACE LYNN MICHELLE EARL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
EARL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. EARL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Earl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Earl, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration and Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
Earl Ray Ross, Jr
Defendant:
Comm'r Social S Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kronk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
David E. Kronk and David Earl Kronk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Equitz v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01072
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Earl Equitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
Fred Earle Payne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Booker v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01591
Plaintiff:
Earl Booker and Earl Booker, Jr
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davis v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
