Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zarnoth v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Rochelle A Zarnoth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michels v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01137
Plaintiff:
Rochelle L Michels
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romano v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03679
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Romano
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dygert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Rochelle M Dygert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michels v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Rochelle L Michels
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Heiman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE D. HEIMAN and Rochelle D Heiman
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shelton v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv07909
Plaintiff:
Diantha Rochelle Shelton
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lathan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv03299
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rochelle M Lathan
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Griffey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00306
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Ann Griffey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
