Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Djedi Order v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DJEDI ORDER and Heru Spencer
Defendant:
State of Montana, State Of Florida, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INCORPORATED et al v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INCORPORATED and TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES WORTH INVESTMENT RELIANCE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Herman P. Johnson v. State of Indiana
as 22-2839
Applicant:
HERMAN P. JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Herman Johnson v. State of Indiana
as 22-2799
Petitioner:
HERMAN P. JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
METALWORKING LUBRICANTS COMPANY
Indiana State of v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Joe R Biden, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
THOMAS v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
BRENDA THOMAS
Defendant:
DCS, SHAMEKA NEWMAN and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
