Cases 1 - 10 of 138
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shapiro v. Assertio Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Perry Shapiro
Defendant:
Assertio Holdings, Inc., Dan Peisert and Paul Schwichtenberg
USA v. Deondre Perry
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEONDRE PERRY, also known as DRE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PERRY v. FED EX CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv01917
Plaintiff:
ALMETTA PERRY
Defendant:
FED EX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perry v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC
as 1:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Curtis Perry
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: Harley-Davidson Aftermarket Parts Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2023md03064
In Re:
Harley-Davidson Aftermarket Parts Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wagner, Edward Heymer, Scott Koller and others
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group LLC, Harley-Davidson Inc and Harley-Davidson Motor Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. Darnell Perry
as 22-3209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL PERRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
