Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Portage Properties, LLC v. Sandcliff, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Portage Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Sandcliff, Inc., Roman Sandcliff, LLC and Clifford Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Like v. Wirco Inc
as 2:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Clifford Like
Defendant:
Wirco Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royce Matthews, Sr. v. Clifford Garwood, et al
as 21-3080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROYCE L. MATTHEWS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD GARWOOD, SUSAN EISENHAUER, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Clifford King, Jr.
as 21-3056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
