Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Young v. Kohl's Inc
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Diane Young
Defendant:
Kohl's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nicolette Langston, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8012
Petitioner:
NICOLETTE A. LANGSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of ZACK LANGSTON and DANAE YOUNG, as mother and next friend for D.L., a minor
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and MID-AMERICA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant:
Juan R Luciano, Michael S Burke, Theodore Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chow v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Raymond Chow
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Vikram Luthar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maverick Young v. Tanya Walton Pratt
as 23-3391
Petitioner:
MAVERICK A. YOUNG
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv15624
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
Coby Young and YOUNG EMERGING STRATEGIES LLC
Sandra Hunter, et al v. Elanco Animal Health Incorporated, et al
as 23-3061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA HUNTER and MARLA STRAPPE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, JEFFREY N. SIMMONS, TODD YOUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
