Cases 101 - 110 of 321
Branscomb et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Plaintiff:
David Branscomb and Tammy Branscomb
Defendant:
James Clark, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pedroza et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
Susan Pedroza and Cecilio Pedroza
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akbar v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LLP
as 2:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LLP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Habeeba Akbar
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2020cv01433
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Montez et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Martin Seifert and Barbara Montez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schoff v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store East, LP and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Schoff
Not Classified By Court:
Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHEURER v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2020cv00918
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SCHEURER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karkiewicz v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2020cv00261
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Karkiewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betz et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv00586
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Walmart Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Betz and Melanie Betz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
KEISHA BONNER WHITE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP (ALSO INCORRECTLY SUED AS WAL-MART STORES, INC.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
