Cases 91 - 100 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Trusty v. Principal of Lowell High School et al
as 2:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Delaina Trusty
Defendant:
Principal of Lowell High School and Dave Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHUANG et al v. ROSENSKI et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CHUANG and KAY KIM
Defendant:
KAREN FREEMAN-WILSON, W OLIVER, DONALD W ROSENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. BP Sparky Mart 2
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Wilson
Defendant:
BP Sparky Mart 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOTE v. HOWARD COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv01602
Defendant:
Lt. ROBIN BYERS, HOWARD COUNTY, MONA MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JARED MOTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
