Cases 11 - 20 of 9,703
Ezra Hill v. City of Harvey, et al
as 24-1940
Plaintiff:
EZRA HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF HARVEY, GREGORY THOMAS and JASON BANKS, Deputy Police Chief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CW Martin, Jr and M K Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Ferrantella et al
as 1:2024cv04353
Plaintiff:
Charles McKenzie
Defendant:
P.O. Ferrantella, P.O. Piskorek and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Defendant:
Ernest Spradley, Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Estate of Daniel Pesavento et al v. Rudebeck et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel Pesavento and HP
Defendant:
Bryce Rudebeck and City of Appleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flinn et al v. City of Evanston
as 1:2024cv04269
Plaintiff:
Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
