Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rollins v. Murphy et al
as 1:2014cv06153
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rollins
Defendant:
Allen Murphy, Willie Hess and Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meeky v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv03542
Plaintiff:
Melvin E. Meeky
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2012cv04914
Plaintiff:
Ruben Lopez, II
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hamilton v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv06515
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Garry McCarthy, Marikay Hagertty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
MURPHY et al v. INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY MURPHY and DARA MARCUM
Defendant:
INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Swinford v. Salvation Army-Safety Net et al
as 1:2007cv01138
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Swinford, Jr
Defendant:
Salvation Army-Safety Net, Peoria Rescue Mission, Peoria Community Connections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
