Cases 11 - 20 of 20
PRISON LEGAL NEWS v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01957
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS and GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TIERNEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv01467
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL TIERNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
OUTLAW v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01440
Defendant:
MICHELLE BERTRAM, STEPHANIE CLAPP, ALISHA COOMER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY OUTLAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEACH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01376
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LEACH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
