Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jan Newell v. Brian Lamere, et al
as 14-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN NEWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LAMERE, P.A. COLGAN, ANTREAS D. MESROBIAN and others
CARLOCK et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Defendant:
RYAN ASHER, PAUL CIESIELSKI, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. CARLOCK and PATRIC MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bartlett v. City of Chicago School District #299 et al
as 1:2013cv02862
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bartlett
Defendant:
City of Chicago School District #299 and Valeria Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newell v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv02018
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Kankakee County Sheriff's Department, Timothy Bukowski and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCartney v. Newell
as 1:2011cv05862
Plaintiff:
Marlon D McCartney
Defendant:
P.O. #547 Newell and City of Markham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes-Newell et al v. Trost et al
as 1:2011cv04655
Plaintiff:
Demetria Hayes-Newell and David Hayes
Defendant:
Mark A Trost , Tyra Brown and Larry Draus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CONNER v. NEWELL et al
as 1:2011cv03010
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CONNER
Defendant:
OFFICER NEWELL, UNKNOWN MARKHAM OFFICERS, CITY OF MARKHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS et al
as 1:2010cv03559
Plaintiff:
TRACY DAVIS , RAYMOND JONES , KEVIN MOORE and others
Defendant:
EXCEL, INC., GLENN DEESE and MICHAEL BROZOVICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
