Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Padilla et al v. Langley et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Padilla, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Joanna Langley, Brian Dawson, Jeff Pharis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown and Yolanda Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Paul Kirner, Star No, 19311, Darren Dehaan, Star No. 14203 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Pinzine et al
as 1:2016cv11232
Plaintiff:
Merary Lopez
Defendant:
Michael Pinzine, Chicago Police Officer Laqui, David Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daniel Padilla v. Larry Peterson, et al
as 15-2942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL S. PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY PETERSON, Doctor and MICHELLE SCHULTZ, Nurse
Padilla v. University of IL Medical Center et al
as 1:2012cv06663
Plaintiff:
Rosa Isela Padilla
Defendant:
University of IL Medical Center, Michael Murphy and Monika Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Village of Westmont, The et al
as 1:2012cv03753
Plaintiff:
Carl Hale and Tonyanikka Harris
Defendant:
Village of Westmont, The, John Majeski, R Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Padilla v. David Baker, et al
as 11-3309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BAKER, KATY W. OLSON and WENDY ROAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Allen v. Village of Westmont, Illinois et al
as 1:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Joe Allen
Defendant:
Village of Westmont, Illinois , Douglas Mantooth , Rolando Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
