Cases 11 - 20 of 29
SEAY v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DP REPORT RECORDED POLICE OFFICERS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TAMIE SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTEAD v. ROACH et al
as 3:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
GLENN A ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
EBONY ROACH, LASHEA ROACH and MICHELLE ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHAFFER et al v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2017cv01537
Defendant:
JASON BURTON, CITY OF KOKOMO, TERESA GALLOWAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROACH and BRANDON SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Hodges - Ronan et al
as 1:2015cv06655
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Chambers
Defendant:
Kamla Hodges - Ronan, Bruce Rauner, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROACH et al v. LOHORN et al
as 1:2014cv01196
Defendant:
DAVID A. AULT, CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES and DAVID ROACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
