Cases 11 - 20 of 496
Harry Rapp v. SSM Agnesian Health, et al
as 24-1033
Plaintiff:
HARRY R. RAPP
Defendant:
SSM AGNESIAN HEALTH, KIMBERLY ROGERS and PAT GUELL
Rogers v. Kimble et al
as 1:2023cv16434
Plaintiff:
Jamar Rogers
Defendant:
Ronald Kimble, The City of Chicago and City of Chicago, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rapp v. SSM Agnesian Health et al
as 2:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Harry Ross Rapp
Defendant:
SSM Agnesian Health, Kimberly Rogers and Pat Guell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Willie Rogers
Defendant:
Nikolos Anderson, Matthew Henson, Kimberly Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eberhardt v. Quality Customs Distribution Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16102
Plaintiff:
Stefon Eberhardt
Defendant:
Quality Customs Distribution Services Inc., Roger Prahl and Frank Sutkus
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hernandez
as 1:2023cv15375
Plaintiff:
Ruben Hernandez
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Geri Lynn Yanow, Alan Pergande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lamar Robinson, et al v. Grace Knutson
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR ROBINSON and MARTELL D. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
GRACE E. KNUTSON
Rogers v. Herigodt et al
as 1:2023cv14468
Plaintiff:
Randy Rogers
Defendant:
Steven Herigodt, Adam Stasinopoulos, Unknown Officer of the Forest Park Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
