Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Dejoy et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Anderson
Defendant:
Louis Dejoy and United States Postal Service (Agency)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wigginton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv50440
Plaintiff:
Richard Wigginton
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, USPS Federal Employees, Kaila Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
McClurge v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv06612
Plaintiff:
Christopher McClurge
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DALE FARIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and WAYNE VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Alyce Anderson v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 22-2402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALYCE R. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Anderson v. DeJoy et al
as 1:2022cv03094
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Anderson
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Shellie Ellison v. USPS
as 22-1967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELLIE ELLISON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Pittman v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Pittman and Ricardo Pittman, Jr
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Louis Dejoy and Temeka Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
