Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MILLER v. JUDICIAL BRANCH et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH, MEDIA, STEVEN MNUCHIN and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Estate of Paul Heenan v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
Estate of Paul Heenan
Defendant:
City of Madison, Noble Wray and Steven Heimsness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Russell v. McDonalds Restaurant et al
as 1:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R Russell
Defendant:
McDonalds Restaurant, Claudia Wray, Christopher Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roderick Flowers v. Noble Wray, et al
as 12-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK V. FLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NOBLE WRAY, Personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Madison Police Department, JOSEPH BALLES, Personally and in his official capacity as Police Captain, Madison Police Department, MARIBETH WITZEL-BEHL, Personally and in her official capacity as City Clerk, City of Madison, Wisconsin and others
Howe, Kelley v. City Of Madison, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kelley Howe
Defendant:
City Of Madison, Wisconsin and Noble Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers, Roderick v. Wray, Noble et al
as 3:2010cv00785
Plaintiff:
Roderick V. Flowers
Defendant:
Noble Wray, Joseph Balles, Maribeth Witzel-Behl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. Wray, Noble
as 3:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
Defendant:
Noble Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottila v. City Of Madison Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv00432
Defendant:
City Of Madison Police Department and Nobel Wray
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Bottila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
