Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Oneal v. Parole Board State of Illinois et al
as 3:2018cv50198
Defendant:
Parole Board State of Illinois, Lori Bridge, Ralph Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Oneal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Walton v. Pence et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Darcel Walton
Defendant:
Michael Richard Pence, Derek P Usman, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganaway v. Bridge et al
as 1:2017cv01290
Plaintiff:
Tarius Ganaway
Defendant:
Lori Bridge, Jeff Bailey, David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
Megan Bridges
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jessica L. Smart and Treta Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carmer v. Cook County et al
as 1:2016cv10149
Defendant:
Cook County , Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart , Officer Bridges and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Carmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bridges v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv04635
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Bridges
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Unknown Employees and Deputies Sheriff and Cook County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
COLLINS v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LAWRENCE COUNTY et al
as 4:2015cv00106
Defendant:
B.O.O.T CAMP, B.O.O.T CAMP: LAWRENCE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LAWRENCE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
