Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Yoder v. Byler et al
as 3:2016cv00735
Plaintiff:
Phillip Yoder
Defendant:
Bryant Byler , James Snyder and Elkhart County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Bryant et al
as 3:2016cv00617
Plaintiff:
Jason C Joseph
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant and Matthew Hassel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHRODER v. MADISON JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 4:2016cv00121
Defendant:
DERRICK BRIGHTWELL, DOES 1-10, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
LILIAN KARENA SCHRODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond v. Miller et al
as 4:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
John E. Richmond, Jr.
Defendant:
William H Miller , Jason S Dexter , Bryant Pearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOP et al v. DURBIN et al
as 1:2015cv01330
Defendant:
BETH BRYANT, JOHN DOES (1-20), DARCY DURBIN and others
Plaintiff:
ABBI COOP and NICK COOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Shortt et al v. Bryant et al
as 3:2014cv01985
Plaintiff:
Gregory Shortt , Kimberly Shortt and Constance Bradley
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant , Joseph Giordano , Jordan Rans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, et al
as 4:2014cv00077
Defendant:
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, DEARBORN COUNTY, STATE OF INDIANA, WILLIAM (BILL BILL) BRUNER, DONNIE BRYANT and others
Plaintiff:
DOUG TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
W. et al v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2013cv00522
Defendant:
BETH BRYANT, JOHN DOES, DARCY DURBIN and others
Plaintiff:
L. W. and L. T. W.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
