Cases 21 - 30 of 45
HEINRICH et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2016cv03026
Defendant:
BRUCE BAKER, RICHARD BOUSLOG, KIM CRONK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER, HANNAH HEINRICH, JAMES KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burnett v. The City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Lamar J Burnett
Defendant:
The City of Fort Wayne , Jason Brown , Timothy Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas Powers v. Lamar Coleman, et al
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAR COLEMAN, Danville Correction Center Chaplain and STEVE KEIM
Lipscomb v. Rockford Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv50327
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Lipscomb
Defendant:
Rockford Police Dept., Schmidt, Schuman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Maroco
as 1:2009cv01173
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Harry Maroco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quinn v. Krauel
as 2:2009cv02033
Plaintiff:
Lamar T Quinn
Defendant:
Bradley J Krauel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lamar Chapman, III v. State of Illinois, et al
as 09-1095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR C. CHAPMAN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, sued as The People of the State of Illinois; a State of Illinois Corporation, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, sued as Cook County, Illinois, a State of Illinois Corporation, LAWRENCE TERRELL, in his individual and official capacity and others
Chapman v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv07133
Plaintiff:
Lamar C. Chapman, III
Defendant:
State of Illinois, County of Cook, Lawrence Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
