Cases 21 - 30 of 300
BOWMAN v. STANLEY et al
as 1:2023cv01794
Plaintiff:
KAI A BOWMAN
Defendant:
SETH STANLEY, JOSEPH SHAFER, TAYLOR BAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carl Culp, et al v. Whitney Woods, et al
as 23-2398
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARL CULP and ROBERTA CULP
Defendant / Appellant:
WHITNEY WOODS and STEVAN SCHULIEN
Carl Culp, et al v. Steve Reed, et al
as 23-2397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL CULP and ROBERTA CULP
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE REED, in his official capacity as Chief of the Fort Wayne Police Department, WHITNEY WOODS, STEVAN SCHULIEN and others
Woods v. Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03892
Plaintiff:
Paul Woods
Defendant:
Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC, Alter Domus Inc. and Alter Domus Luxembourg S.A.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Flores, Valerie v. Horn, Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
Allen Horn, Cody Woods, Hope Barajas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Freeman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02629
Plaintiff:
Tina Freeman
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Michele A Wood, Jose Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
