Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anthon v. Baker et al
as 2:2009cv00973
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Kerry F Baker, Joe Croissert, Eric K Shinseki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthon v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 2:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs and Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthon v. Shinseki et al
as 2:2009cv00974
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki, Chris Norton and Michael Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthon v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 2:2009cv00955
Plaintiff:
Robert Eric Anthon
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs and Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
