Cases 41 - 50 of 55
CLARK v. HUMPHREY et al
as 4:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
BART CLARK
Defendant:
JUDGE HUMPHREY, LAWRENCEBURG MENTAL HEALTH and DEARBORN COUNTY, LAWRENCEBURG, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CLARK v. HUMPHREY
as 4:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
BART CLARK
Defendant:
JUDGE HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. REZXALLA et al
as 1:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
NADER REZXALLA, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUDGE JAMES JOVEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STARR v. CITY OF NOBLESVILLE et al
as 1:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALAN STARR
Defendant:
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE, COUNTY OF HAMILTON, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEATON-GRAY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00479
Plaintiff:
ADRIA DEATON-GRAY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEATON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA DEATON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER, JAMES W. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TAYLOR et al v. NATIONAL CITY BANK et al
as 1:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
ERIC TAYLOR and GAIL TAYLOR
Defendant:
NATIONAL CITY BANK, SAMUEL L. JACOBS, WILLIAM W. HURST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. Ulfig et al
as 3:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
Jasper Frazier
Defendant:
Karleen Ulfig, Judge William T Means and Mark S Lenyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. Elkhart Indiana County of et al
as 3:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Stephens
Defendant:
Elkhart Indiana County of, Judge Evan Roberts, Elkhart County Board of Commissioners of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
