Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Mack, Jr. v. Rockford Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv50145
Plaintiff:
John Robert Mack, Jr.
Defendant:
Rockford Police Department, Rodney Lane and Erin Hanagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neiman v. Arnold et al
as 1:2017cv00887
Defendant:
Kimberly Arnold and Diane Lane
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Neiman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Melendez et al
as 1:2016cv11200
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Davis and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Officer Lisa Melendez, Officer Jordan Zuniga, Officer Christopher Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Lane Grant Dodson
Defendant:
Douglas Carter , David Bacon , Matthew Emenhiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv01435
Plaintiff:
Joyce Lane
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department , William Mucci and David Leigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lawrence v. 420 East Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv07434
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Lawrence
Defendant:
420 East Ohio, Chicago Housing Authority, 345 East Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Village of Forest Park et al
as 1:2016cv05441
Plaintiff:
Gladys Perez
Defendant:
Village of Forest Park , Eric Entler, Nick Treantafeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv00962
Plaintiff:
MELODY BARROWS, NICHOLAS BARROWS and COLE LANE
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CORIZON, LLC, CRAIG GRAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
