Cases 51 - 60 of 637
Swick v. Apple
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swick v. Comcast Business
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Adam R Swick
Defendant:
Comcast Business
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patinkin v. Sutker-Dermer et al
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
Seth S. Patinkin
Defendant:
Shelley Sutker-Dermer, Jeffrey L. Warnick, Adam M. Kingsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Akil Carter, et al v. City of Wauwatosa, et al
as 23-2111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKIL K. CARTER, PAULETTE H. BARR and SANDRA K. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WAUWATOSA, JAMES MACGILLIS, PATRICK KAINE and others
Wynn, Charles v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Charles Ruben Wynn
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Heather Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03400
Plaintiff:
Evans Robinson, III and Evan Robinson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, C.J. Smith, C.W. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Adam Hendrix v. Leonardo Garcia, et al
as 23-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM HENDRIX
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONARDO GARCIA, REGINALD MATHEWS, ARI FISZ and others
The Satanic Temple Inc. et al v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple Inc. and Adam Vavrick
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
