Cases 61 - 70 of 1,206
STEELE v RESTORATION BUILDERS, INC.
as 1:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Chadd Steele
Defendant:
Restoration Builders, Inc. f/k/a Elbert Construction, LLC and RESTORATION BUILDERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stephen Lush v. Rhonda Lanford, et al
as 23-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
RHONDA L. LANFORD, STEPHANIE L. HAUSER, WISCONSIN INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and others
Loyd v. 18th Judicial Circuit Court of Dupage County, The et al
as 1:2023cv06287
Plaintiff:
Darrin K Loyd
Defendant:
18th Judicial Circuit Court of Dupage County, The, 18th Judicial Circuit Ct. Clerk of DuPage Co, DuPage Co Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kevin Williams v. Brian Lammer
as 23-2629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN K. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lush, Stephen v. Lanford, Rhonda et al
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Rhonda L. Lanford, Stephanie L. Hauser, TOCA Soccer Center Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patel v. The United States
as 1:2023cv04808
Plaintiff:
Raj K Patel
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
