Cases 81 - 90 of 151
Lawrence et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Craig Lawrence and Alberto Hinojosa
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Garcia, Ruben Martinez Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra T.E., et al v. Karen Grindle
as 10-3506
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDRA T.E., DEBORAH K., JANE DOE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KAREN GRINDLE
Hall v. Adams et al
as 3:2010cv00819
Plaintiff:
Austin Hall
Defendant:
Sean Adams , John Doe , Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliot v. Price et al
as 3:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
Kim Elliot
Defendant:
Jared Price , Brian Siefferman , Erin Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Katrina Williams
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond LLC , John Doe and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Safford v. Malloy et al
as 1:2010cv04741
Plaintiff:
Corey Safford
Defendant:
Malloy, Raferty, McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Doe, et al v. Teamsters Local 700, et al
as 10-2746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JIMMY DOE, WILLIE ROE, JOHNNY WOE and others
Petitioner - Appellee:
EARL DUNLAP
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY and CLARA COLLINS
Intervenor - Appellant:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 700
R. v. WILLIAM PENN ELEMENTARY #49 et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Defendant:
RHONDA AKERS, JANE DOE, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rednour v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rednour
Defendant:
Ralph Jones, Jeremy Kempfer, Eric Steely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.