Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stewart et al v. Derbort et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Julie Hawkins, Jarryd Hawkins, Vicki Stewart and others
Defendant:
Massey, Shane G. Brandel, E.L. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Clark-Bey v. East Peoria Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01218
Defendant:
East Peoria Police Department and United States Marshals
Plaintiff:
Tony Clark-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEELE v. JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., KEITH BROADY, JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
JARVIS PEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
