Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cahill v. PGA Tour et al
as 1:2014cv08031
Plaintiff:
Charles Cahill
Defendant:
PGA Tour and Golf Channel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03565
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Andrew Kemps and Brian Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cahill v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv00361
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cahill
Defendant:
Thomas Dart , C. Martinez , E.N. Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark, Jill et al v. Klausing, Craig et al
as 3:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jill Clark, Jill Clark, P.A., Jill Clark, LLC and others
Defendant:
Craig Klausing, Martin Cole, Cassie Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujano v. Carranza et al
as 1:2012cv02153
Plaintiff:
Adam A Lujano
Defendant:
Aaron Carranza, Brian Cahill, Jason Vucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cahill v. Town and Country Towing et al
as 3:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Richard Cahill
Defendant:
Town and Country Towing, Harry Halter and Village of Alorton IL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cahill et al v. Childers et al
as 1:2011cv02200
Plaintiff:
Cutchlow Fisher Cahill, Fani El Isa Beth Cahill El, Isaac Charles Cahill and others
Defendant:
Michael Childers, Danny Windham, Jeffery Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
