Cases 1 - 10 of 85
MCCAULEY v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
DEREK STEVEN MCCAULEY
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, SHANNON O'CONNELL EGAN, CATHY DONDZILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant:
PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
BEVERLEY SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON and BEVERLEY C. SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, GUNNAR ORTLIEB, BRAD SEIFERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Meacham v. Board of Education et al
as 1:2023cv15277
Plaintiff:
Rose Meacham
Defendant:
Board of Education, Department of Education, Cathy Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THALHEIMER v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
TREVIN THALHEIMER
Defendant:
CHARLES CAMPBELL, TOWN OF BROOKVILLE, TERRY MITCHUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nave v. Pugh et al
as 1:2022cv03991
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sesley Nave
Defendant:
Lamont Pugh, Christy Wells, Peter Theiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nave v. Wells et al
as 1:2022cv03566
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ken S. Nave
Defendant:
Christy Wells, Peter Theiler, Cathy Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
