Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MAYO v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: BRIANNA MAYO
Defendant: SHERIFF DUANE BURGESS, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CHARLES J WARREN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kazmierczak v. Parry et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff: Kyle A. Kazmierczak
Defendant: Duane Parry and Michigan City Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bauer v. Parry
as 3:2022cv00736
Plaintiff: Matthew Jason Bauer
Defendant: Duane Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOLING v. BURGESS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02208
Plaintiff: JAMES S BOLING
Defendant: DUANE BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00047
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
NICKELL v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03193
Defendant: FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff: DUANE NICKELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff: Dewayne Rogers
Defendant: Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICUS v. LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01571
Defendant: JARROD DUANE BRADBURY, DEVOY, LARRY FANNIN'S FAMILY FORD, LLC and others
Plaintiff: AMY MICHELLE DICUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01673
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?