Cases 1 - 10 of 693
Jackson Jr Trust v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Larry Otis Jackson Jr Trust
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Edward D Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moses v. Brooks et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Randol Moses
Defendant:
Officer Brooks, Officer Jackson, Officer Piattoni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEELE v. JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
JARVIS PEELE
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, JEFFERSONVILLE CITY COUNCIL, KENNY KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Malone et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv03111
Plaintiff:
Nadeja Malone, Stephen Paris, Acelyn Paris and others
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Kevin byrd, Derek Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Powell v. Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
FAWN POWELL
Defendant:
Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital doing business as MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND and MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
