Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sillah, Abdoul v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2023cv00096
Not Yet Classified:
Abdoul Malick Sillah
Defendant:
City of Madison, Dane County, John Bauman and others
Interested Party:
State Of Wisconsin Department Of Health & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Gatton et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Estate Plaintiff:
Tamara Meyers
Defendant:
Marcus E Gatton, Jason Spencer, Sean Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. Coffey et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Jason Hufnagle, Kellie Knauer, Travis Musser and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica G Davison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BATLER et al v. MELLINGER et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Defendant:
SCOTT MELLINGER, MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JUSTIN WEBER
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA BATLER and JON MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MEEKS
as 1:2020cv01269
Defendant:
CHAD MEEKS
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Austin (Warden) et al
as 1:2020cv01170
Defendant:
Glen Austin (Warden), Shartyse Pumfrey, Steven Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randolph v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv07704
Defendant:
David Taylor, Star No. 18525, Timothy Loring, Star No. 4769, Erik Haney, Star No. 3591 and others
Plaintiff:
Shontaa Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
