Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rezny et al v. Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions et al
as 2:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Earl Rezny, ACRDGroup LLC and American Community ReDevelopment Group LLC
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, Leslie Van Buskirk, Mark Dorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03773
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs and Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Temple et al
as 1:2019cv08476
Defendant:
Jacob Temple, Lee Zeitlin, Louis Dattomo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Defendant:
Fort Wayne, City of and James Chambers
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staadt v. McDonald et al
as 4:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael William Staadt
Defendant:
Robert A McDonald, Michael R Stephens and Ena J Lima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Williams v. Bautista et al
as 1:2016cv05797
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Miguel Bautista, William Molina, Dominik Drozdel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02853
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bitzer v. Ashbeck et al
as 1:2011cv00859
Plaintiff:
Evan Bitzer
Defendant:
Michael William Ashbeck, Town of Wabeno and Forest County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
