Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lara v. George et al
as 1:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Martha Lara
Defendant:
Kimberly George, Amy Olivia, Kanisha Pettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, et al
as 22-2332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. M., by her mother and next friend, E.M.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, in her official capacity
Intervenor:
STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, RILEY GAINES, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Finnigan v. Carrillo et al
as 1:2021cv04685
Plaintiff:
Deanna Finnigan
Defendant:
SGT. Robert Carrillo # 2429, P.O. Michael Pettis #15422, P.O. Jairo Valeriano #10649 and others
Intervenor:
The Law Office of C.N. Norris, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAYNE v. GANNON et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
AMBER ALLEN, LENA ANDERSON, MEGAN ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH RAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PETTIS v. R.R. DONNELLY & SONS
as 1:2014cv01707
Defendant:
SARA KAGAY, R.R. DONNELLY & SONS and RICHARD SCHNADIG
Plaintiff:
BERNARD J. PETTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
