Cases 1 - 10 of 19
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bowers v. Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs et al
as 2:2021cv00749
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Paul E Knapp and Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Frost v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY FROST
Defendant:
VICKI WIREMAN, TIPPECANOE COUNTY, ADAM GRANT WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kiel Stone v. Alex Bowman, et al
as 18-2247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIEL R. STONE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX C. BOWMAN, PAUL E. SINGLETON, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Stone v. Bowman et al
as 3:2018cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Alex Christopher Bowman, Elizabeth A. Hardtke, Paul E Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
