Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Friend v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Defendant:
Sheriff Elkhart County Sheriff, Wellpath LLC, Jeff Siegel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Friend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Mark Duncan v. Siegel et al
as 3:2023cv01009
Estate Plaintiff:
The Estate of Mark Duncan and Mark Duncan
Defendant:
Sherrif Jeff Siegel, Captain David Lanzen, Elkhart County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ryan Armstrong v. Federal Government, et al
as 23-3097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN C. ARMSTRONG and RYAN CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, STATE OF ILLINOIS, KWAME RAOUL and others
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Muhammad EL v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05635
Defendant:
James A. Shapiro, Curtis Weathersby, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Nobele Antoine Muhammad EL and Noble Antoine Muhammad EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Welsandt-Burchett v. Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co. et al
as 1:2015cv02421
Plaintiff:
Lori Welsandt-Burchett
Defendant:
Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co., New Venture Holdings, LLC, The Dump Furniture Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
