Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RHYME v. POLLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
DARRELL RHYME
Defendant:
NICULY POLLEY, KAITLIN JACKOWICZ, UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Peck et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Robinson
Defendant:
Terry Peck, R Pineda, M Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINS v. SHARPE et al
as 1:2021cv00898
Defendant:
BEN ROGERS, TINA DOYLE, REBEKAH FARRINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHARTZER v. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL SHARTZER
Defendant:
CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, HAYDEN A. CRAIG, JEFFERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QAHHAR v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2017cv00126
Defendant:
KAYLIN, UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ESAU I. QAHHAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wallace v. LaGrange County Indiana
as 1:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
James Wallace and Jeryl Wallace
Defendant:
LaGrange County Indiana , Karl Vaughn , Arron Knisley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00386
Defendant:
ANY AND UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS WHOM NAMES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND/OR COMMISSIONER COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
WAYDE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pope v. Gary Housing Authority LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00301
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pope, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Housing Authority LLC, Horynak, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEAVER v. COMBS et al
as 4:2007cv00107
Plaintiff:
NGA WEAVER
Defendant:
JESSE COMBS, TAMI WATSON, GRAND VICTORIA CASINO & RESORT, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
